Buscar en este blog

Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Tibial plateau fractures. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Tibial plateau fractures. Mostrar todas las entradas

27 agosto 2014

Trauma: Tardar mucho operando se complica con infección

Surgical site infection after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures.
Lin S, Mauffrey C, Hammerberg EM, Stahel PF, Hak DJ.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Jul;24(5):797-803

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for surgical site infections and to quantify the contribution of independent risk factors to the probability of developing infection after definitive fixation of tibial plateau fractures in adult patients.

METHODS:
A retrospective analysis was performed at a level I trauma center between January 2004 and December 2010. Data were collected from a review of the patient's electronic medical records. A total of 251 consecutive patients (256 cases) were divided into two groups, those with surgical site infections and those without surgical site infections. Preoperative and perioperative variables were compared between these groups, and risk factors were determined by univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression. Variables analyzed included age, gender, smoking history, diabetes, presence of an open fracture, presence of compartment syndrome, Schatzker classification, polytrauma status, ICU stay, time from injury to surgery, use of temporary external fixation, surgical approach, surgical fixation, operative time, and use of a drain.

RESULTS:
The overall rate of surgical site infection after ORIF of tibial plateau fractures during the 7 years of this study was 7.8% (20 of 256). The most common causative pathogens was Staphylococcus aureus (n=15, 75%). Independent predictors of surgical site infection identified by multivariate analyses were open tibial plateau fracture (odds ratio=3.9; 95% CI=1.3-11.6; p=0.015) and operative time (odds ratio=2.7; 95% CI=1.6-4.4; p<0.001). The presence of compartment syndrome (odds ratio=3.4; 95% CI=0.7-15.9; p=0.119), use of temporary external fixation (odds ratio=0.5; 95% CI=0.2-1.7; p=0.298), and ICU stay (odds ratio=1.0; 95% CI=1.0-1.1; p=0.074) were not determined to be independent predictors of surgical site infection.

CONCLUSIONS:
Both open fracture and operative time are independent risks factors for postoperative infection.

26 agosto 2014

Trauma: Un balón para recuperar la forma

Reduction and Stabilization of Depressed Articular Tibial Plateau Fractures: Comparison of Inflatable and Conventional Bone Tamps: Study of a Cadaver Model.
Heiney JP, Kursa K, Schmidt AH, Stannard JP
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014 Aug 6; 96(15):1273-1279

BACKGROUND

Restoration of articular congruity and mechanical integrity of subchondral bone are important surgical goals of the treatment of intra-articular fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the reduction quality and biomechanical integrity between cadaveric intra-articular tibial plateau fractures reduced with an inflatable bone tamp and contralateral fractures reduced with a series of cylindrical conventional metal bone tamps.

METHODS
A standardized lateral tibial plateau split-depression fracture was created in each leg of fourteen pairs of cadaver legs. In each pair, the fracture on one side was reduced under fluoroscopy with use of an inflatable bone tamp and the fracture on the contralateral, control side was reduced with conventional bone tamps and a mallet. Any residual bone defects were filled with calcium phosphate bone-void filler. The constructs were stabilized with a lateral tibial plateau buttress plate. Each articular reduction was qualitatively graded by blinded observers using fluoroscopic images, three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans, and visual inspection of the articular surface. Quantitative volumetric analysis was performed to calculate under-reduction, over-reduction, and total malreduction volumes. Each reduced fracture was cyclically loaded and then statically loaded to failure under axial compression, and the strength and stiffness of the constructs were compared between sides.

RESULTS
The majority (eleven) of the fourteen fractures reduced with the inflatable bone tamp were rated as having a better reduction than the contralateral fracture reduced with the conventional bone tamps. The median over-reduction and malreduction in the inflatable-tamp group (7% and 21.6%, respectively) were significantly less than those in the conventional-tamp group (19.2% and 47.1%), although the median under-reduction (6.2% in the inflatable-tamp group and 9.6% in the conventional-tamp group) did not differ significantly between groups. The fractures reduced with the inflatable tamp displaced less during cyclic loading than those reduced with the conventional tamp. Median static stiffness and yield load were also significantly higher in the inflatable-tamp group (880 N/mm and 704 N) than in the conventional-tamp group (717 N/mm and 641 N).

CONCLUSIONS
As compared with contralateral control fractures treated with conventional bone tamps, fractures treated with an inflatable bone tamp had qualitatively and quantitatively better reduction, typically resulting in a smoother articular surface with less residual defect volume. Fractures reduced with an inflatable bone tamp exhibited less subsidence during cyclic loading and greater stiffness under static loading compared with those treated with conventional bone tamps.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Using an inflatable bone tamp in association with calcium phosphate bone-void filler to reduce and maintain reduction of an articular fracture may help in achieving the surgical goal of a more anatomic reduction with better resistance to subsidence.



Trauma: ¿Qué poner antes, el substituto óseo o los tornillos?

Bone substitute first or screws first? A biomechanical comparison of two operative techniques for tibial-head depression fractures.
Hoelscher-Doht S, Jordan MC, Bonhoff C, Frey S, Blunk T, Meffert RH
J Orthop Sci 2014 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to investigate a drillable and injectable bone substitute (calcium phosphate cement) and the operative technique enabled by the drillable option in a new biomechanical fracture model for tibial depression fractures in synthetic bones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Lateral depression fractures of the tibial plateau (AO 41-B2, Schatzker III) were created in a biomechanical fracture model in three different synthetic bones (Sawbone 3401, Synbone 1110/1116). Reproducible fractures were generated employing Synbone 1110, which exhibited a comparable strength to human osteoporotic bones and was used for the further experiments. After reduction of the fractures, the stabilization was performed with two different operative techniques. In group 1, first an osteosynthesis with four screws was performed and then the metaphyseal defect was filled up with calcium phosphate cement (Norian drillable). In group 2, initially the filling up with Norian drillable was done enabling a complete filling of the defect, followed by placing of the screws. Displacement under cyclic loading with 250 N for 3,000 cycles, stiffness, and maximum load in load-to-failure tests were determined.

RESULTS
A comparison of the two operative techniques of stabilization showed a distinctly lower displacement and higher stiffness for group 2 when the defect was filled up first. For the maximum load, no significant differences could be demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS
A complete filling of the defect by first applying the calcium phosphate cement significantly reduces the secondary loss of reduction of the depression fracture fragment under cyclic loading with a clinically relevant partial weight bearing. The beneficial effects of drillable calcium phosphate cement may also be transferable to defects other than tibial-head depression fractures.

19 agosto 2014

Trauma: Ojo a las lesiones concomitantes en las fracturas de meseta tibial

Arthroscopy-Assisted Surgery for Tibial Plateau Fractures.
Chen XZ, Liu CG, Chen Y, Wang LQ, Zhu QZ, Lin P.
Arthroscopy. 2014 Aug 12

Abstract

PURPOSE:
This study aimed to summarize the recent clinical outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopy-assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) for tibial plateau fractures.

METHODS:
A systematic electronic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed in January 2014. All English-language clinical studies on tibial plateau fractures treated with ARIF that were published after January 1, 2000 were eligible for inclusion. Basic information related to the surgery was collected.

RESULTS:
The search criteria initially identified 141 articles, and 19 studies were included in this systematic review. There were 2 retrospective comparative studies, 16 case series studies, and one clinical series based on a technique note. There were a total of 609 patients in this systematic review, with a mean follow-up time of 52.5 months. The most common fracture types were Schatzker types II and III. Concomitant injuries were common: 42.2% of the patients had meniscal injuries, and 21.3% had anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. In addition, the status of 90.5% of the patients was classified as good or excellent according to the clinical Rasmussen scoring system, and 90.9% of the patients were satisfied with the treatment. Only 6 severe complications were reported, including one case of compartment syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS:
ARIF is a reliable, effective, and safe method for the treatment of tibial plateau fractures, especially when they present with concomitant injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:
Level IV, systematic review of Level III and Level IV studies.